Now that
The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins has become a hit movie and the book series is popular with teens, controversy is starting to form around the fact that the book and movie involve children killing children.
My own 7th grade daughter had already read the series through her school library, so even if I wanted to stop her, I couldn't have. She did see the movie as well, which she claimed she didn't like as well. But it wasn't until I saw parents posting their concerns on Facebook and elsewhere that I decided to read the book for myself.
I've only read the first book, but I'll be reading the full series soon (
Catching Fire and
Mockingjay). It's unlikely that I'll be seeing the movie.
Dystopian literature is nothing new.
1984 is the most famous and most prophetic novel of a tyrannic society that I have personally read, but there are many others, including
Lord of the Flies,
Atlas Shrugged,
Fahrenheit 451 and so on. In fact, if you consider yourself an educated person, you ought to have read those four books at least.
What's different about
The Hunger Games is that it's aimed at children and about children. Or, more accurately, teenagers. I think that's a significant distinction, because 16-year-olds who have been living with the responsibilities of adults for years are quite a different thing than innocent 7-year-olds. In fact,
Lord of the Flies, which was required reading when I was in high school, involved younger children in a more frightening social environment than does
The Hunger Games (THG from here on out). Another dystopian series aimed at children is the
Shadow Children series by Margaret Peterson Haddix, which my 4th grader devoured. So the idea of making children, the most vulnerable in society, the focus of grim situations, is nothing new. What THG and Shadow Children do is to cast children as the heroes and empower them.
To be honest, I found THG to be a fascinating, well-paced, well-written book. I'm eager, as my daughter was, to find out what happens in the next book. The concept of "children" killing "children" would be disturbing to some, but I didn't see anything I wouldn't let any child of mine, middle school age or higher, read. The descriptions were neither graphic nor terribly emotional, allowing the reader to either skim the horror in his or her own mind, or fill in the blanks themselves if desired.
By focusing on the violent aspect, one ignores the larger themes of the book. Which is really a shame, because they're not that hard to pick out. The book addresses the larger themes of oppressive government, sure, but also prejudice and stereotyping, media's role in government and society, "killing" vs. "murder," sacrifice, staying true to oneself, how to live with your actions/consequences for even "heroic" actions, what you are willing to do to survive, trust, and of course the ubiquitous love triangle.
In other words, THG is a truly literary book, and it's not going away any time soon. It's sophisticated in a way that the
Twilight series could never hope to be.
If it's the violence you abhor, then put away your
Uncle Tom's Cabin,
Huckleberry Finn,
Harry Potter, and
The Outsiders, because those books contain scenes of sometimes very disturbing violence. To reject a book based on violence alone takes a lot of very important pieces of literature out of your repertoire.
If the question is how old should a person be to read THG, then my personal recommendation is middle school, depending on the child. I have no qualms over letting my 7th grader read it, but I don't think my 4th grader is ready for it yet. But as a parent, it's your job to figure out what your child can handle, and if a book has themes or scenes that concern you, the least you can do is discuss it with your child.
However, I am strongly against the idea of banning books outright. Yes, there are a lot of books I would not let my 7th grader read yet, but I have nothing in my library that I wouldn't let her read
eventually. Many of them are more appropriate for high school or even college readers, mostly because of sexual overtones. I especially don't like the idea of Christians (they're the ones who tend to have concerns over popular books) limiting their reading material, whether their concerns are violence (THG), sorcery (Harry Potter), or vampirism (Twilight). First of all, those frameworks are usually just that--a framework of reference. They're what make the books entertaining. The "real" stories are contained within. But the themes are universal. Getting squeamish over the framework can unfortunately blind you to what the book is trying to communicate to you.
A Christian needs to be an intelligent reader, and while there are many books I won't read simply because they truly are gratuitous trash, I balk at the idea of refusing to read a book simply because parts of it are distasteful. A lot of books that are required reading today were on banned lists years ago. Perhaps you think that society is going downhill, fast, but I believe that no one, especially Christians, benefit from an entirely closed mind. If a book offends you, by all means, don't read it. At the very least, examine why it's unacceptable literature. If it causes you to lose your faith, don't read it. If your faith is strong enough to handle controversial themes, here's a secret--those are the most interesting, discussion-worthy books of all.
But to be honest, out of all the trash out there, THG hardly qualifies as faith-shattering literature. If anything, it's got several themes worthy of discussion. And I, for one, can't wait to read the next book in the series,
Catching Fire.